docs: add Mirrors section to README (canonical + GitHub) #490
Labels
No labels
Agent
Compat/Breaking
Kind/Bug
Kind/Documentation
Kind/Enhancement
Kind/Feature
Kind/Security
Kind/Testing
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Reviewed
Confirmed
Reviewed
Duplicate
Reviewed
Invalid
Reviewed
Won't Fix
Status
Abandoned
Status
Blocked
Status
Need More Info
No milestone
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Total time spent: 5 minutes 47 seconds
Due date
igor
5 minutes 47 seconds
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
joshtronic/igor#490
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Two README changes in one docs PR: the Mirrors section, and de-Forgejo-ing the wording (the harness is headed toward multi-forge/multi-harness portability -- the README shouldn't read as Forgejo-only).
Deliverables
Insert this section into
README.mdafter the intro paragraph(s), before the first existing##section, exactly:Generalize the Forgejo-specific wording in
README.md(three spots as of today):Agent-labeled Forgejo issue" -> "claims oneAgent-labeled issue from the git forge" (or equivalent).git clone <forgejo-url>/<bot-user>/igor->git clone <git-repo-url> ~/.local/share/agent(the placeholder is the repo URL itself, forge-agnostic).Agentlabel" -> keep the substance, name Forgejo only as the current example: e.g. "the forge's label set (on Forgejo, the Advanced template) + a customAgentlabel".Keep any Forgejo mention that is genuinely about the current implementation (API specifics in docs/ are fine and out of scope) -- the README's job is to describe the harness, and the harness's forge is an implementation detail.
Out of scope
README.md; any docs/ content.Verification
git diffshows hunks only in README.md;grep -c -i forgejo README.mddrops to the implementation-example mentions only.igor referenced this issue2026-08-09 21:14:20 +00:00
#Nmatch, not the first, when the shadow reviewer resolves a PR's linked issue #500#Nmatch, not the first, when the shadow reviewer resolves a PR's linked issue #500